State guides
Federal employer taxes are the same everywhere. State unemployment insurance, workers compensation and statutory leave programs are not, and together they can swing the cost of the same hire by more than a thousand dollars a year. These guides set out the 2026 figures for ten of the largest hiring states, with an honest range rather than a single number.
| State | New employer unemployment rate | Taxable wage base |
|---|---|---|
| California | 3.4 percent for new employers | 7,000 dollars per employee per year |
| Texas | 2.7 percent for new employers, or the industry average if that is higher | 9,000 dollars per employee per year |
| New York | about 4.1 percent for new employers, including the reemployment fund | about 13,000 dollars per employee per year, indexed annually |
| Florida | 2.7 percent for new employers | 7,000 dollars per employee per year |
| Washington | varies by industry for new employers, commonly in the 1 to 3 percent range | 78,200 dollars per employee per year |
| Illinois | 3.35 percent for most new employers | 14,250 dollars per employee per year |
| Pennsylvania | 3.822 percent for new employers | 10,000 dollars per employee per year |
| Ohio | 2.85 percent for new employers | about 9,000 to 9,500 dollars per employee per year |
| Georgia | 2.7 percent for new employers | 9,500 dollars per employee per year |
| North Carolina | 1.0 percent for new employers | 34,200 dollars per employee per year |
Cost of hiring an employee in California
California pairs one of the smallest unemployment wage bases in the country with one of the largest federal unemployment bills, which surprises employers who only read the headline rate.
Read the California guideCost of hiring an employee in Texas
Texas is a low friction state for payroll tax, but the new employer unemployment rate is not a flat number for everyone and workers compensation is optional in a way it is not anywhere else.
Read the Texas guideCost of hiring an employee in New York
New York has the highest new employer unemployment rate in this cluster and a set of small statutory insurance lines that employers elsewhere never think about.
Read the New York guideCost of hiring an employee in Florida
Florida runs one of the lightest statutory employer loads in the country, which makes benefits and workers compensation the entire story.
Read the Florida guideCost of hiring an employee in Washington
Washington has the highest unemployment wage base of these ten states by a wide margin, and it charges workers compensation by the hour rather than as a share of payroll.
Read the Washington guideCost of hiring an employee in Illinois
Illinois sits in the middle of the pack on rate but above it on wage base, so the state unemployment bill is a few hundred dollars higher per head than the southern states.
Read the Illinois guideCost of hiring an employee in Pennsylvania
Pennsylvania is the one state in this cluster where employees also pay an unemployment contribution, and where local wage taxes add a layer of administration.
Read the Pennsylvania guideCost of hiring an employee in Ohio
Ohio is a moderate cost state on payroll tax with one structural difference: workers compensation runs through a state fund rather than a private market.
Read the Ohio guideCost of hiring an employee in Georgia
Georgia keeps employer statutory cost low and predictable, with one small extra assessment that appears and disappears from the schedule depending on the year.
Read the Georgia guideCost of hiring an employee in North Carolina
North Carolina has the lowest new employer unemployment rate in this cluster and one of the highest wage bases, which is a combination worth understanding before you assume it is the cheapest option.
Read the North Carolina guide